|

THE
RECESSION WILL ULTIMATELY BE SEVERE
by Bob Bronson
Bronson Capital
Markets Research
January 9, 2008
Despite
permabull hype, as reflected especially by many of Larry Kudlow’s
guests on CNBC, the second revision in 3Q GDP neither obviated nor
postponed the persistently developing -- and very predictable --
recession.
Our
stock market and economic cycle template, or SMECT
model clearly illustrates the "perfect storm" of
several business and economic cycles contracting simultaneously and
suggesting, well in advance, that the oncoming
recession will be more severe than average
We
have also pointed out that GDP, which does not include crucial
employment data, is not the best measure of the business cycle.
The 87% of GDP that does reasonably reflect the true business cycle
-- that is, Personal Consumption Expenditures plus Fixed Investment from
the National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA) data -- adjusted for
price inflation and population growth (i.e., per capita), reasonably
reflects the true business cycle. The business cycle portion of
the NIPA data has been contracting for the past eight quarters (see
the narrow blue line in the first chart below).
One
of the best measures of the business cycle is the coincident indicator
index produced by the Conference Board, which does includes
nonagricultural payrolls as one of its four-component index (see the
bold black line in the second chart below). This index is in the
process of topping out, as we have been expecting, especially with
further downward revisions.
The
last recession sharply declined at first, then double-dipped,
persisting for a full 2.5 years -- not just the eight months
designated by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
-- again see the bold black line, and along with the light and dark grey
shaded areas in the second chart below. In contrast, the
current recession has been developing more slowly. If it continues
at this slow pace, then it will likely persist for longer – perhaps
much longer – than the last one. Thus, we fully expect it will
be ultimately perceived as severe, if not very severe (i.e., duration
times magnitude).


Consistent
with our observations concerning employment (which is, again, not part
of the NIPA data for GDP), Merrill Lynch economist David Rosenberg says
Friday's weak jobs report leads him to believe the recession is already
here. Friday's employment report confirmed his suspicion that the
economy was transitioning into an official recession towards the end of
last year.
Here
are Rosenberg’s observations, with which we agree as slightly
modified, plus a confirming chart from Chart of the Day:
At
no time in the past 58 years has the unemployment rate risen 60 basis
points (50 bps is the actual recession threshold) from the cycle low
without the economy slipping into recession, and now have the jobless
rate hitting 5% in December versus the March/07 trough of 4.4%.
Aggregate
hours worked in the economy contracted at a 0.4% annual rate in 4Q, and
this comes on the heels of a 0.6% decline in 3Q. Back- to-back declines
in total hours worked have always been associated with recession.
The
breadth of the report was also very poor, with the diffusion index for
private sector employment slipping below the 50 bps? cutoff mark, just
like the Purchasing Manager’s ISM index fell to 48.4% from 52.2% in
November. A number below 50 indicates that a plurality of industries are
now in the process of cutting jobs outright. Heading into the last
recession, this index fell below 50 in February 2001 and the recession
began ... exactly one month later.
The
level of unemployment is up 13% YoY, again a development that has always
been consistent with past recessions. The YoY rate of change in the
level of the unemployed who have been idle for at least 15 weeks is
particularly ominous - +20%, which is a pace that prevailed in the early
stages of prior economic downturns (hitting this trend in April/01 and
in Aug/90 when the recessions were one month old).
And
Household Employment contracted 49,000 in 4Q and the YoY trend slowed to
+0.2% in December from +2.2% a year ago, another classic recession
signal. Consider for a second that in March 2001 that trend was running
at +0.8%, and in July of 1990 the pace was +1.1% - those two months
represented the onset of a technical recession and yet the trend in
Household jobs is weaker now than it was then.
In
sum, Rosenberg believes last Friday's employment report strongly
suggests that an official recession has arrived. The recession dating
committee at the NBER will be the final arbiter for him, but since it
waits for conclusive evidence, including benchmark revisions, it may be
two years before they make that call. However, according to
Bloomberg news, Martin Feldstein, chairman of the NBER, said this
morning that, in his opinion, last Friday’s jobs data increased the
odds that the economy is already in recession to greater than 50%, and
he has previously opined that this recession “could be deeper and
longer than the recessions of the past.”
Note:
This article was originally written previously on January 7th, 2008 for
subscribers.

© 2008 Bob Bronson
Editorial Archive
Contact
Information
Bob Bronson
Bronson Capital Markets Research
Email
|