|
Everyone is telling you these days that the Canadian oil sands are the
place to invest. Some commentators are talking about how the oil sands
could produce more crude than Saudi Arabia, warning you not to miss the
boat because investment dollars worldwide are about to flood to the
region, making a fortune for all involved.
Most
analysts will then go on to recommend stocks like Suncor Energy,
Canadian Oil Sands Trust or UTS Energy as ways to cash in on the oil
sands mania.
The
problem: these three stocks—darlings of so many pundits—have a
combined market cap of roughly $60 billion. There’d better be a lot of
investment money coming… because it’s going to take a tidal wave of
dollars to move the share prices of these large-caps.
True,
if you had invested in these companies a year ago, you would have
doubled and perhaps even tripled your money. Not a bad return. But with
these stocks having already gained so much, so fast, it’s now going to
take a double or triple of last year’s investment influx to achieve
the same returns. As an investor in these companies you’re pushing a
rock up a hill that’s growing steeper by the day.
That
said, I am a believer in the oil sands sector. Simply put, political
problems are looming in almost every major oil-producing nation around
the globe. Iraq is a mess, with production still below the levels prior
to the U.S. invasion. Iran looks like it may be next on Bush’s hit
list. Nigeria has 420,000 barrels of oil production shut in because of
attacks on pipelines and platforms. Russia is a Jekyll-and-Hyde game:
one day happy to share its petro-riches with the world, the next turning
off the taps to its neighbors. The Venezuelan government recently seized
control of numerous oil fields, effectively evicting major companies
from the country.
With
all this going on, the Canadian oil sands may be the only significant
oil reserve on “friendly” soil. As such, I’m not surprised to see
the region getting a lot of attention. If I was U.S. energy secretary,
I’d be shopping for a good townhouse in Fort McMurray.
But
as a speculator, I’m always looking for ways to maximize my profits.
Even though I see the oil sands as a sector whose time has come, I have
a hard time sinking my money into a multi-billion-dollar company
that’s on the lips of every Wall Street lackey. When everyone’s
talking about something, you should look elsewhere.
But
where? As speculators, I believe our best bet is to look for companies
that are working oil sands plays in new areas that haven’t been
recognized by the street. Go beyond the boundaries of the Suncors of the
world to find the next big thing.
I’ll
give you an example. In February of this year, an unknown numbered
company, 1122131 Alberta Ltd, paid C$465 million for a set of oil sands
leases in a part of Alberta that—at the time—looked to be rank moose
pasture. The land was completely outside of the area where oil sands are
known to exist.
Puzzled,
our staff at Casey Research looked at the data and realized that the
area was indeed a bust for conventional oil sands… but it was perfect
for pursuing a completely new type of play. You see, the oil sands we
usually hear about are hosted in sandstone that lies at relatively
shallow depths. But many people don’t realize that there’s a
completely different type of oil sands found deeper down, hosted in
carbonate rock known as the Grosmont formation. In the March edition of
the Casey
Energy Speculator, we postulated this might be what 1122131
Alberta was after.
A few
weeks later, our suspicions were confirmed. Shell announced that it was
the player behind 1122131 Alberta, and it was indeed planning on
pursuing the Grosmont.
Although
this example of extending the oil sands into new areas didn’t provide
a direct investment opportunity, it got us thinking about what other
“new” oil sands plays might be lurking out there. Looking at a map,
one possibility burned bright: Saskatchewan.
With
attention focused on Alberta’s oil sands, few analysts have noted that
development abruptly ends at the province’s eastern border with
Saskatchewan. Do the rocks suddenly disappear? Unlikely.
In
fact, looking deeper we found historical evidence that Saskatchewan
hosts rich oil sands. Perhaps even richer than Alberta’s. The problem
is politics. The Saskatchewan government has been all but closed to
development, meaning that almost no companies have pursued projects
here.
I say
almost none because it turns
out there is one little-known oil sands developer working in
Saskatchewan. A company it just so happens holds a land package larger
than all Alberta’s oil sands projects combined. With management that
has already built one oil sands company into a billion-dollar player.
But
despite these glaring positives, the company has gotten little love from
the market. So much so that when we came upon it, it was trading at a
$200 million market cap—tiny by oil sands standards. In December 2005,
we jumped on the huge potential here and within three months saw gains
as high as 315%—the kind of returns you get by going where others
haven’t.
The
best thing is that despite this run, the stock is still less than half
the market cap of the smallest Alberta oil sands company—with
potential for reserves that dwarf those of most Alberta players. I
can’t mention the name here—it would be unfair to Casey
Energy Speculator subscribers—but rest assured this is a
story that will be receiving a great deal of mention in the pages of our
letter.
Bottom
line: if you’re considering investing in the oil sands—and I believe
there are many reasons you should—or in any other “hot” sector for
that matter, look for ways to “extend the trend”. Uncover
opportunities that are beyond most investors’ radar at the moment, but
which have the ability to benefit from the rising tide once they do
break. Doing so, you’ll maximize your returns… and garner a great
deal of pleasure when the talking heads on CNBC start touting the
company you bought months ago as the next big thing.

© 2006 Doug Casey
Editorial Archive

www.caseyresearch.com
and www.kitcocasey.com
|