|

TH*NK*NG
(LIQUIDITY)
by Fred
Cederholm
Economic Analysis
Column
Columnist, Baltimore
Chronicle & Sentinel
August 20, 2007
I’ve
been thinking about liquidity. Actually I’ve been thinking about the
weather, equity markets, the housing bubble, the Fed’s interest rates,
Creston, and valuations. As I begin to write this week’s column and
look out the window, it’s raining. It has rained here off and on for
six of the past seven days – the forecast for the coming week is the
same. When the ground is already saturated, it doesn’t take much more
to make a bad situation a whole lot worse. The same can be said as true
for the problems unwinding in the world’s financial markets because of
this whole sub-prime credit housing mess.
You
see the term liquidity refers to more than water. In financial/ economic
terms it refers to the ebb and flow in the ability to redeem or convert
one form of asset/ liability into another. Money (that is cash) is
regarded as the most fluid medium of exchange. When you wish to purchase
something - be it food, clothing, energy… (whatever); it is much
easier to consummate the deal by using cash than it is to get what you
desire by swapping stocks, bonds, real property, or bartering
commodities for it. A major part of any exchange transaction is
valuation. How much of “X” will I give up to get so much of “Y”?
Despite
all the claims of some new world order, a new economic “reality,” a
new global economy, or this new paradigm/ basis for valuing/marketing
investments vehicles; recent events are showing that all the hype and
spin is a bunch of hooey. The traditional economic rules of supply and
demand setting prices, real wealth or value coming from assets and not
liabilities, cash/ money being central to transactional exchanges, and
something only being worth what someone else will pay for it are still
with us. This is not going to change regardless of what the poobahs of
Washington, DC, the moguls of Wall Street, or the central bankers of the
world tell us. I mean… it is their “scripting” that got us here.
This
housing bubble was no accident. It was the deliberate creation of cheap
money, excess cash, and a decision to create “a soft landing” from
the “irrational exuberance” of a dot com mania, a stock market run
amok, and an ill conceived conspiracy to fluff the US economy by
promoting spending and consumption. The spending was facilitated by an
increase of debt, fiat money, and inflation, not by any increase in
production, growth of real wealth, or rise in productivity. The money
came via the printing presses and the recycling of foreign holdings of
our existing debts and deficits. We were all too willing. Because more
money (albeit borrowed money) flowed thru our fingers, we thought we
were better off.
There
is now tremendous pressure on Chairman Bernanke and the FED to
“create” more money and cut interest rates to fix liquidity
problems, bail out the debt laden public, and fluff the equity market
averages. Has everyone forgotten that it was such policies that got
US/us where we find ourselves now?
The
FED did infuse (print) an additional $59 BILLION over a mere 48 hours
and they cut the discount rate (special money created by the FED and
lent to banks) by a half a per cent. The FED Funds Target Rate remained
the same at 5.25% - for now. Any change there would be admitting a lie -
any increase would signal how inflation is far worse than acknowledged;
any cut would signal why our booming economy is in trouble. Either
way… the FED’s credibility is shot as any honest broker of
information.
My
little home town of Creston was pretty much isolated in the cornfields
of northern Illinois from the travails of the world over the years –
not any more. Out of a real property stock of some 200 properties, there
are currently 15 houses, 9 lots, and 10 rental units on the market. The
same seems to be true everywhere across this land. People need to (or at
least want to) cash out and thus improve their
liquidity. The same now seems true for all investments. But…
what will you get? What’s the value?
These
loans pooled, packaged, and sold as investments are dragging down
everything. With so many properties in arrears, default, foreclosure,
and going on the market; is it any wonder why so many “investments”
are at best - worth less; or at worst - worthless? What will be all
affiliated costs to global investors, insurance companies, money market
funds, mutual funds, or pension funds when all this “construction
dust” settles? I’m Fred Cederholm and I’ve been thinking. You
should be thinking, too.

© 2007 Fred Cederholm
Editorial Archive
Contact
Information
Fred
Cederholm
Creston,
IL USA
Email
| Website
|