|
Editor’s
note:
The
price of gasoline has been rising over the last several weeks, as
traders are betting on major shortages during the peak summer
driving season. Although the current buying was based on the phase
out of MTBE based gasoline and the related logistics, in this
installment of the Peak Oil series, Dr. Duarte looks at the
validity of the situation and concludes that $3 gasoline is
possible during the summer driving season. Other installments in
the series can be found below:
Gasoline
Crisis Possible Although Jury Still Out
Consumers
and investors might be facing an extended run of rising gasoline
prices by the traditionally tight summer driving season, although
some experts are calling the mainstream expectations of such
shortages as overblown.
The
switchover from MTBE to ethanol and other gasoline additives is
the major reason for traders to be bidding up the price of
gasoline in the futures markets, and is accelerating the rise in
the price of gasoline at the pump.
The
key is whether this run up is justified, or otherwise. To be sure,
on paper it is an important development, and is just another cog
in the machine toward higher energy prices. When this set of
events and its potential effect is added to the still unrestored
production in the Gulf, the unlikely to be resolved anytime soon
lack of refinery capacity, and the geopolitical risk to oil
exploration and production, the case for $3 gasoline over the
summer is almost a slam dunk.
According
to the Chicago Sun Times: "The price of gasoline could rise
this summer because of supply problems from the phaseout of a fuel
additive found to contaminate groundwater."
Yet,
representatives of the ethanol and oil industries told Congress on
Wednesday that ethanol shortages, the indirect reason for the rise
in gasoline prices, are not going to happen.
MTBE
At The Center Of The Controversy
The
additive is MTBE, a clean air additive that was put in place in
1990, but may be a cancer causing agent that has seeped into
ground water and has led to a litigation frenzy. Congress has not
exempted the oil industry from such litigation, so the oil
industry is abandoning MTBE in favor of less litigious additives
such as ethanol.
And
while the ethanol industry is sanguine about its prospects for
supplying enough of their fuel, an Energy Department expert
suggests that the situation is far from clear.
According
to the Chicago Sun Times: "Guy Caruso, the head of the Energy
Department's statistical division, is doubtful, and told the
Senate Environment and Public Works Committee that the imminent
transition from MTBE to ethanol "could cause temporary supply
dislocations and may cause price volatility." His agency
estimates that 130,000 barrels per day of extra ethanol will be
needed beginning May 5, an amount equal to 150 percent of current
output."
The
Transportation Issue
Assuming
that there is enough ethanol to meet demand, there is another
issue, that of getting the stuff from one place to another.
Because
gasoline containing ethanol tends to attract water, it can't be
shipped by pipeline. That means that trucks and railroad cars that
specialize exclusively in the transport of the fuel will be
needed.
According
to UPI: "Bill Douglass, who testified on behalf of the
Society of Independent Gasoline Marketers of America and the
National Association of Convenience Stores, told the committee
that gasoline wholesalers were scrambling to hire more truckers as
well as contractors to clean out and prepare tanks for ethanol
storage."
According
to the Oil & Gas Journal: "The ethanol supply crunch
already is being felt now and will continue at least through May 6
when MTBE lawsuits can be moved into the federal court system. The
ethanol supply chain faces issues of delivery of this new and
necessary component of gasoline into terminals, then blended with
RBOB to make finished gasoline, and finally delivered into service
stations."
The
situation could be worsened by the fact that "many terminals
do not have the space for separate tanks" in which to blend
and hold the new ethanol blends "and many terminals lack
access to the rail system used to deliver bulk ethanol."
Conclusion
The
repercussions from seemingly unrelated events continue to drive
fuel prices higher.
The
combination of a well-meaning act of Congress, the addition of
MTBE to gasoline in order to decrease pollution, has gone all
wrong.
The
substance may cause cancer, and its removal from the environment
is certainly called for.
Litigation
has led to the escalation of events, at a time when the already
tight fuel refinery system in the U.S. is near a crisis due to the
lack of capacity to meet demand.
Hurricane
damage to refineries and production in the Gulf of Mexico, which
remains largely unrepaired, is another factor that is exacerbating
an already concerning situation.
In
other words, we have another energy crisis building.

© 2006 Joe Duarte, M.D.
Dr. Duarte's Bio and Archive
|

Joe
Duarte, M.D.
|
Joe
Duarte M.D. is founder and Editor in Chief of Joe-Duarte.com. Dr.
Joe Duarte's Daily Market I.Q. is a premium service that provides
daily intelligence, trading strategies, and technical analysis at www.joe-duarte.com.
Duarte offers free analysis and news coverage at www.intelligentforecasts.com
. Dr. Duarte is a board certified anesthesiologist, a registered
investment advisor, and President of River Willow Capital
Management. He is author of "Successful Energy Sector
Investing" and "Successful Biotech Investing"
(Prima/Random House). Duarte's analysis appears regularly in major
outlets including CBS MarketWatch
and Investor's Business Daily.

|
|