|

MEASURING
"CHEAP"
by George
Kleinman
Editor, Commodities
Trends
November 12, 2007
Last week, the Dow Jones
Industrial Average suffered its worst weekly loss in five years with a 4
percent drop. The Dow is now down 8 percent from its highs, but it's
still up 5 percent for the year.
Are stocks cheap now?
Are they getting cheaper? How do you measure "cheap?"
Gold is up 30 percent
on the year. Is that expensive?
What about oil?
At $96 a barrel, oil
prices are up 57 percent this year. Of the 30 commodities I actively
follow, oil is the most expensive. However, as the legendary trader
Jesse Livermore once observed, when a market is cheap or expensive,
there’s probably a reason.
Livermore said he
always made money selling short low-priced markets—the public’s
favorite—in which a large long interest had developed. Alternatively,
he cashed in on expensive markets when everyone was bailing out because
the public thought the market was high enough for a healthy
reaction.
The
public was selling soybeans short at $6 a bushel in 1974 because this
was an all-time high and into resistance. Who could have guessed they
weren’t even halfway to what would be record highs above $13 a bushel
that year?
It's not the price
that's important, it's the market action.
The real question is:
How do we analyze relative values?
One method I use is to
look at the ratio of one key commodity to another. For example, on Nov.
9, crude oil futures closed at $96.32 a barrel and gold futures closed
at $834.70 an ounce. By dividing the price of gold by the price of oil,
we see mathematically that today one ounce of gold buys 8.66 barrels of
oil.
How has this ratio
performed over time? The chart below illustrates the relationship.
Gold/Oil
1985-Present

At 8.66, this ratio is
historically low. That makes gold cheap in relation to oil despite the
fact gold is up 30 percent this year. The lowest this ratio has
been in recent history was 6.3 during the summer of 2005. (In August
2005, oil was $69 a barrel; gold was $435 an ounce.) The ratio high was
32.5 in July 1986, when oil was only $11 a barrel and gold was $357 an
ounce.
Looking at the history
of this relationship, the mean (or average) was about 20-to-1. In other
words, if oil remains at $96 a barrel, gold should be trading 20
times higher at $1,920 an ounce.
What about other
relationships?
Silver closed at $15.54
an ounce on Nov. 9. One ounce of gold today buys 53.7 ounces of silver.
The chart below shows how this relationship appears historically.
Silver/Gold
1985-Present

Contrary
to what you may have been thinking, this chart indicates silver is
expensive in relation to gold; the range has been a low of 45 and a high
of 99. The average has been about 75, so if this ratio returns to a norm
and gold prices remain at $835 an ounce, then one ounce of gold
should buy 75 ounces of silver at about $11 per silver ounce. With
$15.50 an ounce silver and a 75 ratio, gold should be worth $1,162 an
ounce.
What about
stocks?
The chart below
illustrates the ratio of the Dow to gold. It's currently 15.6, which
means the Dow buys 15.6 ounces of gold. In 1999, this ratio
was 42-to-1 (stocks were expensive) and it was less than 4-to-1 in 1987
right after the stock crash (stocks were cheap).
Dow/Gold
1985-Present

What if the Dow dropped
to 11,500 again--where it was just one year ago--and this ratio moved
back to 4-to-1, indicating cheap stocks? Gold would then be
valued at $2,875 an ounce.
There certainly are
endless ways we can play with these ratios. While $2,000 an ounce or
higher for gold may seem outrageous today, these prices don't
appear to be so out of line in light of historical
relationships. Of course, these are dynamic markets, and oil prices
could certainly tumble, with gold remaining at its current levels.
Or maybe the Dow will move back up.
However, my sense is an
economic downturn is coming, stocks are moving lower, and although
oil may not move much higher, it's not going to collapse either. By
performing this exercise, we can view the markets from new perspectives
and imagine incredible possibilities.
And it certainly makes
gold look cheap.

© 2007 George Kleinman
Editorial Archive

KCI Communications, Inc.
1750 Old Meadow Road, Suite 301
McLean, VA 22101
703-394-4931
phone 703-905-8100 fax Email
Risk
Disclaimer
Futures and futures options can entail a high degree of risk and are not
appropriate for all investors. Commodities Trends is strictly
the opinion of its writer. Use it as a valuable tool, not the "Holy
Grail." Any actions taken by readers are for their own account and
risk. Information is obtained from sources believed reliable, but is in
no way guaranteed. The author may have positions in the markets
mentioned including at times positions contrary to the advice quoted
herein. Opinions, market data and recommendations are subject to change
at any time. Past Results Are Not Necessarily Indicative of Future
Results.
Hypothetical
Performance
Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of
which are described below. No representation is being made that any
account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those
shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between
hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently
achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of
hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared
with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does
not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can
completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading.
For example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a
particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material
points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are
numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the
implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully
accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and
all of which can adversely affect actual trading results.
|