Navarro's
Big Economic Picture
A
Bummer From Ben?
So
there’s talk now that the Federal Reserve may not only hike interest
rates yet again on June 29th.
The Fed may go the whole enchilada and raise the stakes by 50
basis points rather than the obligatory 25.
There’s
no question that inflation is at the very top end of the Fed’s range.
hat supports the 50-basis point bet.
Analysts are also citing a stronger than expected earnings season
thus far as evidence that the economy is stronger than folks are giving
it credit for. On top of this,
there is the two-week move in the ten-year treasury bond from under 5%
to almost 5.25%.
Militating
against this rash act by the Fed is a continued downshifting in the ECRI
weekly leading index. That index
now has the U.S. economy projected to grow at an annualized rate of only
1.4%, less than half of potential output.
At
least to this analyst, the data is suggesting a stagflation scenario –
simultaneous inflation and slowing growth – that Fed policy will be
unable to cure. Any rate
hike such as the 50-point hike being bandied about would further slow
the economy down. A failure to
raise rates would be a failure to put the lid on growing inflationary
pressure. Checkmate.
Of
course, all of this is an empty speculation without reference to how the
markets might react. After all,
this column is about making money – or, in these perilous bearish
times, at least not losing any.
My
guess is that the Fed’s bind is also the stock market’s bind.
It’s hard to imagine a bullish move up on the back of a
50-point rate hike – although I’m sure there will be those
Pollyannas who see such a move as the final “one and done” that
would pave the way for a bullish resurgence.
On
the other hand, the bond market might rally nicely on a 50-point hike
– sure in its convictions that such a big hike will indeed drive a
stake through the economy’s heart, quell inflation, and drive yields
down as bond prices go up. How do
you spell yield curve inversion?
So
it will be if nothing else, a bit more of an interesting week than
summer usually gives us. Bon
chance!
This
Week's Market Movers - Fed
Moves
Earnings
season will continue apace and, together with speculation about the Fed,
dominate the week’s action. On
the economic report front, it will be useful to watch new home sales on
Monday for any signs of a bursting bubble yet.
Plus, we get a double dose of consumer news on Tuesday and Friday
with Consumer Confidence and Consumer Sentiment.
Last but not least, we’ll get our last revision of the 1st
quarter GDP on Thursday, with little change expected.
Portfolio Shorts and Pans - EPIX and
VITA
Both
of my biotech holdings EPIX and VITA had a little air let out of their
balloons last week after nice move’s up.
I’m holding and using the downshift to scale up on Vita.
Other than that, this is a good time to be in cash

Davio's
Hedging Your Bets
Mark
Ups or Downs & More Fed Musings
As
we come to the last week of June and the end of the 2nd
quarter, the markets haven broken out of their 4-year volatility snooze.
That is a good thing for traders. That is a bad thing for
indexers and buy-and-holders.
The
market finished flat again for the 2nd week in a row.
Everyone seems to be waiting
for the FOMC and their next steps. The
market is clearly in tight control by the FOMC at this point.
Will it be .25 or .50 next week?
Depends on how hard a line the Fed wants to take. I would think
.5 would achieve a hard lined attitude and allow them to wait and see
for the remainder of the summer, but I don’t know if they have the
guts to raise .5 and rock the boat. Everyone
has the innate desire to be loved and Bernanke is no different.
I think the market wants to rally and is greatly oversold on many
technical levels at this point. The problem I struggle with is that
everyone is a technician and sees all those same signs.
o . . the conundrum continues for both the Fed and the Traders.
There are some good
arguments from both a bullish and bearish perspective. The bulls can
point to the nearly historic extremes of pessimism we saw a week ago and
show all the stats about future equity returns we usually get from
panics like that. The bears can point to our so-far limited ability to
rally in the face of those readings, which is a hallmark sign of weak
markets.
I think we continue to
wait for the FOMC Thursday and the month/quarter end mark up or mark
downs this week.

Vaino's Biotech
Corner
Oh Canada! Oh
Cardiome!
July
1 is Canada Day, the national celebration of Canada’s birth as a
nation in 1867. Aside from being,
as many of my American friends like to point out, “America’s
goody-two shoes little brother,” Canada is
also America’s largest trading partner.
Here’s a particular trade you might want to ponder:
Cardiome
Pharma (CRME) is a Canadian biotech company focusing on heart disease.
Cardiome’s lead clinical compound is the sexily named RSD 1235.
It is used to treat atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm),
and it has undergone two successful phase three clinical trials.
Both studies were for administration via IV injection.
The drug works by regulating the sodium and potassium channels
that control contraction of the heart.
On
news that the FDA rejected their filing (with partner Astella) of a New
Drug Application (NDA) the stock dropped from over $11 the last week of
May, and is now trading just above $8. The
important aspect here is that the rejection of the application was
not due to clinical issues, but rather with problems in the submission
itself. That is, there
were inconsistencies between patient records in different parts of the
filing.
To
be clear, this type of error is stupid carelessness that should never
happen. It’s a shame that
the efforts of, likely, hundreds of scientists were devalued by the
inattention of the regulatory affairs department.
Regardless, this type of mistake has happened before and will
happen again. While this is a
setback, it doesn’t negate the beneficial effect of the drug.
In
data from the phase three study, IV formulation of RSD 1235 was found to
return 52% of patients suffering atrial fibrillation to a normal
heartbeat as compared to 4% of the placebo group.
The drug works, but getting it to market is going to be slowed
down. CRME also has an oral
version of this drug in a phase two study.
The
stock dropped because investors panicked at bad news.
This is what most investors do. My
take is this creates a buying opportunity.
From a technical point of view the moving averages are
(obviously) bearish, but MACD and stochastics are bullish.
The drug will be approved and the stock will go back up, eh.

“Any
trader or investor who ignores the power of macroeconomics over the
world’s
financial markets will, sooner or later, lose more than they
should—and if they are
trading on margin, perhaps more than they
have.”
-- If It's Raining in Brazil, Buy Starbucks
|

|
Peter
Navarro is a business professor at the University of California
and the author of the best-selling investment book
If It's
Raining
in Brazil, Buy Starbucks. His latest book is
The
Well-Timed Strategy |
|

|
Matt
Davio is a managing partner at the hedge fund,
Red Rock Capital Fund.
Catch
his Daily
Blog as PeterNavarro.com
|
|

|
Andrew
Vaino is a Ph.D. chemist who spent two years at
The Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, CA, working in the
laboratories of Nobel-Laureate Barry Sharpless and Kim Janda. He
currently teaches at The University of Maine, where his research
group is focused on exploring the interface between enzymology,
organic chemistry, and nanotechnology. |
© 2006
Peter Navarro, Matt Davio and Andrew Vaino
www.peternavarro.com
Editorial Archive
CONTACT
INFORMATION
Peter Navarro
Irvine, California USA
Email
| Website
DISCLAIMER:
This newsletter is written for educational purposes only. By no means do
any of its contents recommend, advocate or urge the buying, selling, or
holding of any financial instrument whatsoever. Trading and investing
involves high levels of risk. The authors express personal opinions and
will not assume any responsibility whatsoever for the actions of the
reader. The authors may or may not have positions in the financial
instruments discussed in this newsletter. Future results can be
dramatically different from the opinions expressed herein. Past
performance does not guarantee future performance.
Disclaimer
|