Navarro's
Big Economic Picture
October
Bull
We
enter the historically best month for the stock markets looking at an
increasingly bullish scenario. Yes,
the economy is slowing, but business investment and activity appears to
be holding strong. Yes,
there is inflation, but more and more voices are suggesting that the
worst of the inflationary pressures are over. Yes,
there is a rapidly declining housing market, but with inflationary
pressures moderating, interest rates on the long end are falling.
This could revive somewhat the refinancing market and thus help
fuel consumption. Lower interest
rates could also help the housing market find if not a bottom than a
much softer landing.
The
other major trend which continues to weigh heavily on my mind is the
issue as to whether are not we are in the midst of a historically
significant decoupling of the U.S. economy from the U.S. stock market.
Historically, the stock and bond markets have both been
reasonably reliable leading indicators of economic activity.
To the extent, our manufacturing base has migrated abroad and
U.S. corporations are becoming increasingly global entities, what may
matter more is the state of global economic conditions.
For example, even if the U.S. economy slows, if Asia and India
and Latin America keep cranking, there’s plenty of earnings to be had
for U.S. companies – and therefore a possibility that their stock
price performance may not reflect U.S. economic conditions.
All
of this said, while I enter October in a bullish frame of mind, I also
am wary of a possible correction in the months ahead that may well be
the major one we have thus far avoided.
This
Week's Market Movers
There’s
mucho data this week and therefore a lot of candidates for to top market
movers. The ISM index on Monday
and factory orders on Wednesday will give us a nice read on the supply
side of the economy. Auto sales
will be of interest on the demand side. But
the big market mover is likely to be the monthly jobs report.
Lower than expected job creation will be perversely bullish as it
will reinforce the declining inflation scenario and conversely.
Place your bets.
Portfolio Shorts and Longs
My
stock of the week is Star Scientific (STSI).
According to Market Edge, “Develops
and licenses technology for the curing of tobacco so as to substantially
prevent formation of carcinogenic toxins present in tobacco and tobacco
smoke, mainly tobacco-specific nitrosamines. It also makes very
low-nitrosamine smokeless tobacco pro ducts and discount cigarette
brands.” The technicals are
strong. Bon Chance.
Two other penny picks – HTI and INSM – continue to base nice with
risk/reward favoring the upside.

Vaino's Biotech
Corner
East of
Hollis-Eden? (or, Hollis Eden: Paradise Lost?)
A
few weeks ago I wrote suggesting a straddle to take advantage of
volatility in Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals (HEPH).
HEPH was waiting to hear from the US Government (HHS) as to
whether or not they’d get a contract on a drug to potentially combat
acute radiation syndrome (ARS). HHS
had said they would render a decision around September 15.
Well, September 15 came and went with no announcement.
To be clear, a look at intra-day charts the last two weeks of
September shows substantial volatility. Closing
the Oct 7.5 straddle at the right time on September 26 would have been a
good move. Implied volatility for Nov 06 HEPH options is an impressive
93%!
On
September 26 HHS announced they had asked HEPH to extend until November
30 its offer to provide HHS with their drug.
Novelos Therapeutics (NVLT.OB), who is also competing for this
procurement received the same notice. I
still think this is a good volatility play, as the company either sinks
or swims based on this procurement and a straddle with December options
is a good play. Now that the
stock price is closer to $5, I would go with $5 strikes.
For
those looking to speculate, toward the end of November I think HEPH will
be a great stock to short. My
take is the same will happen November 30 as happened on September 15,
that is, no announcement and the stock will take a huge plunge.
Myself ,I also picked up some NVLT.OB----a purely speculative and
highly illiquid play, but I think they have as good a shot at the
HHS procurement as HEPH and the stock is less than a buck.
Let’s
look more broadly at why trading biotech is fun – and risky.
Where
has all the volatility gone, long time passing?
I’m
going to compare for you the volatility of stock prices across some
sectors as well as the broad market.
As a general observation, volatility seems to be on hiatus these
past few months. The CBOE’s
Volatility Index (VIX) provides a snapshot of expected stock market
volatility over the next 30 days. With
the VIX flirting with historic lows, I was wondering just where exciting
places to trade might be.
Now,
as mentioned above, the VIX represents the implied volatile (IV) in the
stock market for the next month. As
a comparison, beta represents the historic volatility of a stock.
To compare volatilities of different sectors of the market, I
thought it would be useful to look at implied volatilities of options on
ETFs representing different market sectors. To get implied volatility I
looked at the closest in-the-money Nov 06 call using the options
calculator from the CBOE. I left
interest at 5% and ignored dividends: this
introduces errors, but this isn’t quantum mechanics—I’m just
interested in a relative ranking. Options are more thinly traded than
stocks, so for price I used the halfway point between bid and ask. I
tried to use the same ETFs I used two weeks ago in comparing correlation
coefficients. A couple of the
ETFs (IYC, UTH, and IYK) were too thinly traded to have a meaningful
price.
Representing
the market as a whole I used, the Standard
& Poor’s 500 ETF, SPY. Representing
biotech and big Pharma, I used the ETFs BBH, IBB, and PPH.
To compare with other sectors I looked at call prices for the
following ETFs: XLE (Energy
Select Sector SPDR), HHH
(Internet HOLDRs), OIH (Oil Services HOLDRs), and RTH (Retail HOLDRs).
Here’s what I got from my calculations:
|
ETF
|
Beta
|
Nov.
IV (%)
|
|
OIH
|
1.71
|
36.4
|
|
HHH
|
1.31
|
29.6
|
|
XLE
|
1.46
|
28.4
|
|
IBB
|
1.36
|
24.0
|
|
BBH
|
0.93
|
19.0
|
|
RTH
|
1.00
|
18.0
|
|
SPY
|
0.98
|
11.5
|
|
PPH
|
0.70
|
9.2
|
Perhaps
not surprisingly, IBB, consisting of smaller biotechs, is expected to be
more volatile than either BBH or PPH. High
IV values for OIH and XLE are consistent with unrest in the Mid-East
(unexpected?) and increasingly turmoil in the oil markets. My
point in all this? Even with the
market as a whole being low on volatility, which some people like—I
guess—trading biotech stocks can still be fun!

“Any
trader or investor who ignores the power of macroeconomics over the
world’s
financial markets will, sooner or later, lose more than they
should—and if they are
trading on margin, perhaps more than they
have.”
-- If It's Raining in Brazil, Buy Starbucks
|

|
Peter
Navarro is a business professor at the University of California
and the author of the best-selling investment book
If It's
Raining
in Brazil, Buy Starbucks. His latest book is
The
Well-Timed Strategy |
|

|
Andrew
Vaino is a Ph.D. chemist who spent two years at
The Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, CA, working in the
laboratories of Nobel-Laureate Barry Sharpless and Kim Janda. He
currently teaches at The University of Maine, where his research
group is focused on exploring the interface between enzymology,
organic chemistry, and nanotechnology. |
|

|
Matt
Davio is a managing partner at the hedge fund,
Red Rock Capital Fund.
Catch
his Daily
Blog as PeterNavarro.com
|
© 2006
Peter Navarro, Matt Davio and Andrew Vaino
www.peternavarro.com
Editorial Archive
CONTACT
INFORMATION
Peter Navarro
Irvine, California USA
Email
| Website
DISCLAIMER:
This newsletter is written for educational purposes only. By no means do
any of its contents recommend, advocate or urge the buying, selling, or
holding of any financial instrument whatsoever. Trading and investing
involves high levels of risk. The authors express personal opinions and
will not assume any responsibility whatsoever for the actions of the
reader. The authors may or may not have positions in the financial
instruments discussed in this newsletter. Future results can be
dramatically different from the opinions expressed herein. Past
performance does not guarantee future performance.
Disclaimer
|