Navarro's
Big Economic Picture
The
Silly Season Tis Upon Us
Before
I get started on this week’s analysis, I want to alert you to an op-ed
I did that appeared last week in the Chicago Tribune about the growing
crisis regarding North
Korea: The Op-Ed begins as
follows:
“North
Korea is a significant threat to global economic and political
security--even without nuclear weapons. Neither the U.S. nor UN
sanctions can bring North Korea to heel--only China can.”
CLICK
HERE to
read the rest of the article in the online Tribune – the link was
still active as of October 14. The
article provides a broader perspective on a serious issue that is
constantly roiling the world financial markets as well worth the read.
As
for the stock market, here’s a quick snapshot from Market Edge that is
consistent with my current short term bullish posture:
“After
a sluggish start early in the week, stocks turned up on Thursday as both
the DJIA and S&P 500 posted new highs for the year. The DJIA
continued on its march to 12000 as it recorded record highs on Tuesday,
Thursday and again on Friday (DJIA – 11960.51). The rally was fueled
by a sharp decline in oil prices and some decent earnings reports.
Friday's retail sales report coupled with a reversal in crude prices
failed to slow the rally as most of the major averages managed to post
gains for the period. For the week, the DJIA gained 110 points (+0.93%)
and ended the period at 11960.
The
NASDAQ continued on a roll as it is now up over 16% from it's 07/21/06
low, 2020.39. … Year-to-date, the Dow is up 11.6% while the NASDAQ has
gained 6.9%. Trading the DJIA (DIA) using a buy/hold strategy has
produced a gain of 1243 points (+11.6%) while utilizing the Market Edge
long/short approach would have generated a loss of 600 points (-5.6%).
“
I
offer this quote because it reiterates a point I made earlier that the
technicians are getting slaughtered this year – as evidenced by the
failure of Market Edge to even match the performance of the indices.
One of the problems here is that everyone is watching the same
technical indicators now and acting on them, which creates a crowd-like
psychology that it has become profitable to fade.
As
for the coming week, we are now in the classic Oct-Nov. silly bullish
season where a lot of money managers bet the farm in an attempt to have
a good year. With some much
money on the long side, the rally is likely to continue.
This
Week's Market Movers
There’s
not a lot of economic reports of import this week but the two that have
clear market moving potential are the producer and consumer price
indices, flying on Tuesday and Wednesday, respectively.
I don’t really expect any inflationary jolts here to wake of
the bears, but my short run trader audience needs to pay these reports
appropriate heed.
Portfolio Shorts and Longs
I
continue to keep my eye on one of Andrew Vaino’s original picks,
Diversa, the biofuels play. DVSA
has made a strong comeback from the sixes and is approaching $10.
My sense is that this could be a stock that once it breaks the
$10 barrier might have a pretty good run.
The big caution would be a collapse in oil prices.
Otherwise Bon chance!

Vaino's Biotech
Corner
it's All About the
Pipeline
Look
at the performance of the biotech exchange traded fund BBH – its
underperforming the S&P by about 10% in the past year – and you
might wonder if investing in biotech is even worth it.
fortunately, the past few weeks have demonstrated why investing
in biotech can be exciting. On
September 25th Acorda Therapeutics (ACOR) announced positive
results of a Phase 3 study, one of two studies the company is completing
in advance of filing a new drug application on an multiple sclerosis
drug called Fampridine-SR.
The stock closed at $2.22 on September 22nd, and was
trading as high as $17.50 on October 13th.
ot bad.
In
a similar vein, New River Pharmaceuticals (NRPH) closed at $26.21 on
October 6 and closed just under $46 on October 13th, also an
OK return. In this case the
jump was on the announcement that the FDA had granted conditional
approval for a drug to treat ADHD.
Now,
to be fair, there have been some pretty good free falls the other way in
the past few months: Neurocrine (NBIX)
went from a high of $63 in mid-April to as low as $9 and Anadys (ANDS)
dropped from over $16 in April to the $3 mark.
Of course, these would have been good short plays.
The
trick to biotech investing is finding companies with good pipelines.
There, that should clear things up!
More
broadly, there will always be a substantial element of risk in biotech
investing. Clinical trials can be
difficult to predict, making stock prices volatile.
I usually prefer investing in companies with the bulk of their
pipeline in Phase 3, but sometimes there are companies with good
pipelines that are mostly Phase 2 candidates.
I think Exelixis (EXEL) is one of those companies.
Exelixis
is a San Francisco-based biotech that has amassed a pretty good
pipeline. The stock took a,
predictable, beating over the summer as they announced a follow-on
offering of stock. While
they have a Phase 3 clinical trial underway, on a drug to treat bile
duct tumors, I think their most exciting product is XL999. XL999 works
by inhibiting kinase enzymes: it’s
mode of action is similar to Novartis’ successful Gleevec.
The past few years inhibiting kinases has been all the rage,
similar to the situation a decade ago when everyone was inhibiting
proteases.
Results
of a Phase 1 study, presented at a November 2005 conference of the
American Association for Cancer Research were very encouraging.
Currently XL999 is being evaluated in six different Phase 2
studies to treat colon, ovarian, non-small cell lung
cancers, renal cell carcinoma, AML, and multiple myeloma.
In addition to the clinical studies for XL999, Exelixis also has
Phase 2 clinical trials underway with other, similar, molecules to treat
diabetic kidney disease and papillary renal cell carcinoma.
They also have three Phase 1 studies underway.
Exelixis
is technically strong, though the stock is stochasitically (and by MFI)
overbought. Positive results on
just one of the Phase 2 studies will give the stock a nice boost.

“Any
trader or investor who ignores the power of macroeconomics over the
world’s
financial markets will, sooner or later, lose more than they
should—and if they are
trading on margin, perhaps more than they
have.”
-- If It's Raining in Brazil, Buy Starbucks
|

|
Peter
Navarro is a business professor at the University of California
and the author of the best-selling investment book
If It's
Raining
in Brazil, Buy Starbucks. His latest book is
The
Well-Timed Strategy |
|

|
Andrew
Vaino is a Ph.D. chemist who spent two years at
The Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, CA, working in the
laboratories of Nobel-Laureate Barry Sharpless and Kim Janda. He
currently teaches at The University of Maine, where his research
group is focused on exploring the interface between enzymology,
organic chemistry, and nanotechnology. |
|

|
Matt
Davio is a managing partner at the hedge fund,
Red Rock Capital Fund.
Catch
his Daily
Blog as PeterNavarro.com
|
© 2006
Peter Navarro, Matt Davio and Andrew Vaino
www.peternavarro.com
Editorial Archive
CONTACT
INFORMATION
Peter Navarro
Irvine, California USA
Email
| Website
DISCLAIMER:
This newsletter is written for educational purposes only. By no means do
any of its contents recommend, advocate or urge the buying, selling, or
holding of any financial instrument whatsoever. Trading and investing
involves high levels of risk. The authors express personal opinions and
will not assume any responsibility whatsoever for the actions of the
reader. The authors may or may not have positions in the financial
instruments discussed in this newsletter. Future results can be
dramatically different from the opinions expressed herein. Past
performance does not guarantee future performance.
Disclaimer
|