|
GOLD
AND SILVER REPORT
A Question of Liquidity Versus Solvency
by Douglas V.
Gnazzo
December 17,
2007
Commentary
(a
short snippet from the full report)
On
Wednesday of last week, 12/12/07, central banks from Europe and North
America unveiled a new plan to help alleviate the stress in the credit
markets by increasing cash available to the banking system.
The
Bank of England, the European Central Bank, the Swiss National Bank, the
Bank of Canada, and the U.S. Federal Reserve, all joined forces to
inject liquidity into the money market – to the tune of $64 billion
dollars.
The
Federal Reserve was the leader of the pack, creating a new temporary
credit auction to facilitate the exchange of cash for a broad range of
collateral held by the banks. This is nothing more than a euphemism for
various types of mortgages and other related securities, all of which
are tied to the housing market. Recently they have been exposed as toxic
waste.
Two
auctions of $20 billion will be made in December, and two more in
January. The Swiss
National Bank and the European Central Bank agreed to swap arrangements
with the Federal Reserve to auction
$24 billion in U.S. dollar funds to banks in Europe.
The
size of the January auctions has not yet been determined, which means
that the total could be above the $64 billion pledged so far.
Most
disconcerting was the statement by the Fed that it is considering making
these auctions permanent, as opposed to temporary. Fed speak being what
it is, God only knows what the Fed has in mind. Is it referring to a
permanent mechanism to be used whenever it deems necessary; or in a
worse case scenario, could it mean that the funds are the same as
permanent open market operations that do not have to be repaid to
the Fed, as do repurchase agreements?
If
the latter ends up being the case, this will indicate that the Fed is very
concerned about the state of the credit markets, as such transactions
amount to direct monetization of debt of any kind – helicopter
money if you will.
Libor
rates were up from last month. In the U.S. this past week, short term
rates fell, but long term rates rose.
The
market perceives future inflationary pressures to be building, causing
them to demand more interest to compensate for the additional
risk.
One
month Libor rates are presently 5.00%, up from last month’s 4.66%.
Three month Libor rates are presently 4.97%, up from last month’s
4.88%.
The
3-month maturity is the most important, as it competes directly with
U.S. 3-month (90 day T-Bill) rates. The difference between the two rates
is referred to as the TED spread.
Not
only are both rates up from prior months, but the shorter term rate is
higher than the longer term rate. This shows stress and reluctance to
borrow by players in the money markets.
The
TED spread closed at 2.10 percentage points. Earlier in the week it had
been as high as 2.21 points. This too reveals underlying stress in the
credit markets and an increase in risk aversion.
In
other words, although the Fed lowered short term rates, credit spreads
in the global money markets remain tight. The short term cost of
borrowing has been reduced, but the willingness of the banks to borrow
has not responded in kind. It has actually decreased. Banks are afraid
of something looming in the shadows. There is no trust.
The
problem in the money markets is not, however, limited to a lack of
liquidity. There are liquidity problems, but there are far worse
ills.
There
is also systemic risk of the solvency of the entire system. This has to
do with fractional reserve lending, as practiced by today’s banks via
a 100% paper fiat monetary system.
If 5%
of all depositors went to the banks at the same time and wanted
to withdraw their money, they would find that there is no money on
deposit in aggregate. Our money supply is nothing more than computer
entries in cyberspace, on the ledger – 21st century style.
In
a paper fiat system, money and credit our created by the very act of
lending. It is conjured up out of nothing.
The
only thing that keeps our monetary system working is faith, and the
belief that 5% of the people will never go to their bank and demand
their money at the same time.
The
ability to raise cash on short notice is referred to as liquidity. The
Fed can provide liquidity on a short term basis. If, however, an old
fashioned run on the banks occurs, the Fed will not be able to
come up with the cash supposedly on deposit.
This
is because of fractional reserve lending. The money just isn’t there,
except for a very small fraction or percentage of it (about 3%). This is
the amount the banks have on reserve/deposit/demand.
The
scary part of the credit crunch is that the solvency of the banking
system is actually being questioned. Providing short term funds to meet
withdrawals is no big deal. That is what the Fed does. They are the
lender of last resort. But this can only be done in isolated instances,
here and there when needed.
The
Fed can not possibly accommodate all obligations, from every
bank, at the same time, at least not without setting off
hyperinflation, which would result from the tsunami of new money and
credit creation.
Prices
and rates would soar in response, as they did in Weimar Germany, and
other nations that have experienced hyperinflation.
Fractional
reserve banking is predicated on a myth: the false belief that our money
is in the banks, on deposit, and that whenever we want it, all we have
to do is to go to the bank and withdraw it. This is not the case.
This
is true for only a very small portion of deposits, less than 5%. This is
not true for 10, 20, or 50% of all deposits, let alone the total
amount in aggregate.
There
is not enough printed money to fulfill any significant amount of these
obligations or promises.
Once
the reserves on deposit (3%) are depleted – the gig is up.
If a
bank cannot fulfill its financial and monetary contracts, it is
bankrupt, unless another bank steps in and bails it out.
When
the entire banking system is bankrupt, who steps in to bail it
out?
This
is the systemic risk that a few lone wolves in the wilderness have been
warning about for years. Its eerie song becomes more audible with every
passing day.
New
schemes to cover up a mortally wounded paper tiger appear to rise from
the ashes every week. The public’s confidence in the Fed is on the
wane, and our currency is fast approaching its twilight years.
Mr.
Paulson’s freezing of interest rates on adjustable rate mortgages is
another such gimmick. Contract law is no longer based on the rule of law
according to the courts, but by the rule and decree of a dictator. This
is not how free market work. This is direct intervention 21st
century style.
Royal
prerogatives are alive and well. Individual freedoms are disappearing
daily, and with them any semblance of a free market, which has become a
mere shadow of its former self.
The
new book, Honest Money, coming
out in January, goes into these subjects in greater detail.
Gold
Gold
was down -2.20 to close the week out at 798.00 (-0.27%). The intra-day
low for the week was 792.30 and the intra-day high was 822.80.
For
the past two weeks the price of gold has hovered right above or below
its lower trend line. It has not yet broken down below it enough, nor
bounced off it high enough, to give a clear signal as to its short term
direction. It is presently consolidating.

Silver
Silver
was down -0.52 to close the week out at 13.98 (-3.60%). This was a
significant drop.
Last
week’s report stated that most of the indicators on the silver chart
were suggesting more downside action was coming, and so it did.
Price
is still below its horizontal support line TURNED resistance.

Histograms
are receding from positive territory back towards zero, suggesting more
downside action may be coming.
MACD
is still slowing rolling over, but has not yet put in a negative cross
over to the downside
The
65 ema provides strong support at 13.02. There is a considerable support
zone between 13.98 and 13.03.
Hui
Index
The
Hui Index lost 25.19 points this past week and closed at 386.87
(-6.11%). This was a sizable loss.
In
last week’s report it was stated that many of the indicators were
hinting at more downside action, especially the MACD, which appeared
ready to make a negative cross over.
This
past week MACD did make a negative cross over. Histograms have also
entered negative territory.

Price
is sitting on the middle Bollinger band, which if it does not hold as
support, would suggest the lower band may be tested (307.66).
RSI
is still above the 50 level, which is constructive if it holds.
Below
is the weekly Hui chart with the Fibonacci retracement levels overlaid.
So far the correction has been according to standard operating procedure
and is healthy for a sustainability bull market.

Moprec
Bottoms
Along
these Moprec bottoms the gld/hui ratio is at or close to BUY the HUI
signal. The reversal almost never fails, the strength of the move,
however, is unknown. This suggests a tradable rally may be at
hand.

The
above chart is from a good friend. Thanks Alex.
New
book coming out the first of the year: Honest
Money

© 2007 Douglas V. Gnazzo
Editorial Archive
All
rights reserved. Any republication without written permission
of author
and Financial Sense prohibited.
CONTACT
INFORMATION
Douglas V. Gnazzo
Honest Money Gold & Silver Report, LLC
Canton Center, CT USA
Email
| Website
About
the author: Douglas V.
Gnazzo is CEO of New England Renovation LLC, a historical restoration contractor
that specializes in restoring older buildings that are vintage historic
landmarks. He writes for numerous websites and his work appears both
here and abroad. Just recently he was honored by being chosen as a Foundation
Scholar for the Foundation for the Advancement of Monetary Education
(FAME).
Disclaimer:
The contents of this article represent the opinions of Douglas V.
Gnazzo. Nothing contained herein is intended as investment advice or
recommendations for specific investment decisions, and you should not
rely on it as such. Douglas V. Gnazzo is not a registered investment
advisor. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and
using methods believed to be reliable, but Douglas. V. Gnazzo cannot
accept responsibility for any trading losses you may incur as a result
of your reliance on this analysis and will not be held liable for the
consequence of reliance upon any opinion or statement contained herein
or any omission. Individuals should consult with their broker and
personal financial advisors before engaging in any trading activities.
Do your own due diligence regarding personal investment decisions. This
article may contain information that is confidential and/or protected by
law. The purpose of this article is intended to be used as an
educational discussion of the issues involved. Douglas V. Gnazzo is not
a lawyer or a legal scholar. Information and analysis derived from the
quoted sources are believed to be reliable and are offered in good
faith. Only a highly trained and certified and registered legal
professional should be regarded as an authority on the issues involved;
and all those seeking such an authoritative opinion should do their own
due diligence and seek out the advice of a legal professional. Lastly
Douglas V. Gnazzo believes that The United States of America is the
greatest country on Earth, but that it can yet become greater. This
article is written to help facilitate that greater becoming. God Bless
America.
The
opinions of FSU contributors do not necessarily reflect those of
Financial Sense.
|